E-mail List Archives
Re: Sliders and MouseDown
From: Isabel Holdsworth
Date: Mar 1, 2019 2:37AM
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- View all messages in this Thread
Thanks guys for your thoughts.
This is very frustrating. I'm not sure whether to pass or fail the
sliders in my audit. I know this type of issue will be fleshed out
once there's an increased uptake of 2.1, but in the meantime I might
pass these sliders and the next auditor might fail them, and there's
no right answer.
Organisations understandably express frustration when they get two
different results from two auditors. WCAG feels like a black art
sometimes. The fact that it exists is a huge positive, but
interpreting it can be so difficult on occasion.
On 01/03/2019, Patrick H. Lauke < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 05:41, Mohith BP wrote:
> [...]
>> This SC states many ways such as providing an UnDo button, etc.
>> You can explore other options such as showing an UnDo when drag and
>> drop on Sliders happens.
>
> At a very high level, I'd say there's an argument that for things like a
> volume slider there's an undo option in that a user can go back and
> change the volume again. It's not an action that's irreversible.
> However, that *may* be stretching the definition a tad.
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
> > > > >
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Sliders and MouseDown"
- View all messages in this Thread