E-mail List Archives
Re: Thoughts on citing multiple WCAG criteria for one issue
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Nov 17, 2019 4:37PM
- Next message: K Barcham: "Search fields hidden behind button"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Thoughts on citing multiple WCAG criteria for one issue"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Thoughts on citing multiple WCAG criteria for one issue"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Thoughts on citing multiple WCAG criteria for one issue"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 17/11/2019 23:35, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
>> As another example, if you have an image embedded in a link and the link
>> itself does not have any visual text and the image doesn't have alt text,
>> that could be both 1.1.1 and 2.4.4.
>
> And also 4.1.2, as then the link lacks an accessible name too.
And, incidentally, I call these sorts of things "Cascades of fail" - see
slide 30 from my recent a11yTO talk here
https://patrickhlauke.github.io/wcag-interpretation/#30 :)
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: K Barcham: "Search fields hidden behind button"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Thoughts on citing multiple WCAG criteria for one issue"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Thoughts on citing multiple WCAG criteria for one issue"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Thoughts on citing multiple WCAG criteria for one issue"
- View all messages in this Thread