E-mail List Archives
Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 177, Issue 4
From: Shannon Urban
Date: Dec 6, 2019 12:06PM
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: quick question on alt text"
- Previous message: Murphy, Sean: "Re: quick question on alt text"
- Next message in Thread: Robert Hardy: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 176, Issue 18"
- Previous message in Thread: Brian Lovely: "Re: [External Sender]WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 176, Issue 23"
- View all messages in this Thread
@Sean - no they're not interactive.
Thanks everyone!
--
*Shannon Urban*
Director of Accessibility
C 608-290-7613
<EMAIL REMOVED>
everfi.com <http://www.everfi.com//>
[image: EVERFI]
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail transmission may contain information that
is proprietary, privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively
for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or
disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended
recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by return
e-mail and delete all copies.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:01 PM < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Send WebAIM-Forum mailing list submissions to
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://list.webaim.org/mailman/listinfo/webaim-forum
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of WebAIM-Forum digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. quick question on alt text (Shannon Urban)
> 2. Re: quick question on alt text (Jared Smith)
> 3. Re: quick question on alt text (Colin Osterhout)
> 4. Re: quick question on alt text (Murphy, Sean)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Shannon Urban < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> To: <EMAIL REMOVED>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:19:29 -0600
> Subject: [WebAIM] quick question on alt text
> I'm very familiar with alt text and its uses, but I wanted to confirm what
> is considered "decorative". I understand graphics like bars and lines,
> etc. would be decorative, but what about if the alt text of an image would
> literally be the same as the text on the screen?
>
> For example, "the boy asked his friend to hold the ladder for him" (that's
> the text on the screen). The image is of the friend holding the ladder for
> the boy - so alt text would be something like "boy holding ladder for
> another boy". It's not conveying any new or additional information, so to
> me it would be extraneous noise and should be null. What do you all think?
>
> --
>
> *Shannon Urban*
>
> Director of Accessibility
>
> C 608-290-7613
>
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
>
> everfi.com <http://www.everfi.com//>
>
>
> [image: EVERFI]
>
>
> Confidentiality Note: This e-mail transmission may contain information that
> is proprietary, privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively
> for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or
> disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended
> recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by return
> e-mail and delete all copies.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jared Smith < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 15:26:57 -0700
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] quick question on alt text
> Yes, alt="" is appropriate here so long as the content of the image is
> conveyed via adjacent or nearby text, and so long as the image is not the
> only thing within a link.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jared
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Colin Osterhout < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 13:29:28 -0900
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] quick question on alt text
> I'm thinking that aria-labelledby would be appropriate in this context as
> well if the items weren't immediately adjacent.
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 1:27 PM Jared Smith < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> > Yes, alt="" is appropriate here so long as the content of the image is
> > conveyed via adjacent or nearby text, and so long as the image is not the
> > only thing within a link.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jared
> > > > > > > > > >
>
>
> --
> Colin Osterhout
> Website Coordinator, University of Alaska Southeast
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Murphy, Sean" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 00:20:01 +0000
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] quick question on alt text
> You didn't indicate if the text and graphic are interactive or not. Is
> this the case?
>
> Sean
>
>
>
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: quick question on alt text"
- Previous message: Murphy, Sean: "Re: quick question on alt text"
- Next message in Thread: Robert Hardy: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 176, Issue 18"
- Previous message in Thread: Brian Lovely: "Re: [External Sender]WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 176, Issue 23"
- View all messages in this Thread