E-mail List Archives
Re: Screen reader support
From: Kalpeshkumar Jain
Date: Apr 21, 2020 5:58AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Landmarks structures"
- Previous message: Karlen Communications: "Re: Screen reader support"
- Next message in Thread: Paul Rayius: "Re: Screen reader support"
- Previous message in Thread: Karlen Communications: "Re: Screen reader support"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Dhananjay,
I do believe accessibility is all about inclusivity.
I am well aware of the accessibility compliance and my question was
strictly limited to SR coverage.
*Kalpeshkumar Jain*
Technical Lead - Mobile Application Development | LearningMate
This mail is governed by the LearningMate Privacy Policy and Disclaimer at
http://www.learningmate.com/disclaimer.html
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:19 PM Dhananjay Bhole < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
wrote:
> Hi Kalpesh,
>
> Accessibility compliance doesn't mean only screen reader support.
> Accessibility compliance for any products or services is beneficial
> for all kinds of persons with disabilities. On the top of that it is
> usable and accessible for persons with out any disabilities.
>
> You should learn meaning of accessibility compliance first then you
> will understand why any organization should adapt accessibility
> compliance.
> Please go through Business case for digital accessibility on W3c-wai.
>
>
>
> www.w3.org ⺠WAI ⺠news ⺠business-case
>
> Adapting accessibility compliance will help organization to avoid any
> legal penalty is the only one of the benefits.
>
> For more clarification you can call me on my contact number that you
> will find in my signature line.
>
> Regards
>
> On 4/21/20, Kalpeshkumar Jain via WebAIM-Forum
> < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > Is there any official statement or document which states that you should
> > support maximum or the least one screen reader?
> > I went through the W3 articles, however could not find any such artefact
> > validating the matter.
> >
> > While it is wise to cover as much screen reader support as possible, even
> > if you support one, you would not attract any litigation.
> >
> > Can anyone help me in finding any evidence for the above statement?
> >
> >
> > *Kalpeshkumar Jain*
> >
> > Technical Lead - Mobile Application Development | LearningMate
> >
> > This mail is governed by the LearningMate Privacy Policy and Disclaimer
> at
> > http://www.learningmate.com/disclaimer.html
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > This mail is governed by the LearningMate Privacy Policy and Disclaimer
> > at http://www.learningmate.com/disclaimer.html
> > <http://www.learningmate.com/disclaimer.html>
> >
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
>
>
> --
> Dhananjay Bhole,
> Accessibility evangelist,
> Cell: +919850123212
> Website: http://www.sites.google.com/site/dhananjaybhole
>
--
This mail is governed by the LearningMate Privacy Policy and Disclaimer
at http://www.learningmate.com/disclaimer.html
<http://www.learningmate.com/disclaimer.html>
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Landmarks structures"
- Previous message: Karlen Communications: "Re: Screen reader support"
- Next message in Thread: Paul Rayius: "Re: Screen reader support"
- Previous message in Thread: Karlen Communications: "Re: Screen reader support"
- View all messages in this Thread