E-mail List Archives
Re: recommendations re WCAG 2.2
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Oct 6, 2020 3:29PM
- Next message: Marissa Sapega: "New webinar to celebrate NDEAM"
- Previous message: Julius Serrano: "recommendations re WCAG 2.2"
- Next message in Thread: Julius Serrano: "Re: recommendations re WCAG 2.2"
- Previous message in Thread: Julius Serrano: "recommendations re WCAG 2.2"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 06/10/2020 22:15, Julius Serrano wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Please can I ask what your recommendations are regarding WCAG 2.2? How
> active should each discipline be (front end, QA, visual design, BA) in
> terms of including it in their processes? Should we focus on 2.1 instead
> and wait for any official announcement?
2.2. isn't even finalised, and the proposed new SCs may well change or
even be dropped completely. And 2.2 builds on 2.1, so it's only really
introducing additional SCs, but the rest is the same (with the exception
of changes of levels for some old 2.1 SCs).
Long story short: focus on 2.1. And when 2.2 is actually
finalised/released, look at the new SCs that it introduces/subtle
changes to any 2.1 SCs it brings.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Marissa Sapega: "New webinar to celebrate NDEAM"
- Previous message: Julius Serrano: "recommendations re WCAG 2.2"
- Next message in Thread: Julius Serrano: "Re: recommendations re WCAG 2.2"
- Previous message in Thread: Julius Serrano: "recommendations re WCAG 2.2"
- View all messages in this Thread