E-mail List Archives
Re: soft hyphens hard coded
From: wolfgang.berndorfer
Date: Jan 12, 2021 8:16AM
- Next message: Mallory: "Re: soft hyphens hard coded"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: soft hyphens hard coded"
- Next message in Thread: Mallory: "Re: soft hyphens hard coded"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: soft hyphens hard coded"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Patrick and all,
If shy is used exclusively for meaningful hyphenation off auto-hyphenation, it would also help to realize SC 3.1.6., I'd suppose.
I don't find a restriction for only *visual* usage of shy here:
https://unicode.org/reports/tr14/#SoftHyphen
Do you have any references for not to use shy for aural issues like in pronunciation?
It is a hack but is it also a possible mechanism for SC 3.1.6?
I looked it up and found that shy is not mentioned in the understanding-article for 3.1.6:
https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/meaning-pronunciation.html
But again, if shy were used exclusively for meaningful hyphenation off auto-hyphenation, it would also help to realize 3.1.6., I'd suppose. Two flies at once: meaningful visual hyphenation and pronunciation.
Wolfgang
- Next message: Mallory: "Re: soft hyphens hard coded"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: soft hyphens hard coded"
- Next message in Thread: Mallory: "Re: soft hyphens hard coded"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: soft hyphens hard coded"
- View all messages in this Thread