E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG 2.0 understanding conformance
From: Birkir R. Gunnarsson
Date: Feb 6, 2021 8:15AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG 2.0 understanding conformance"
- Previous message: Spiro: "WCAG 2.0 understanding conformance"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG 2.0 understanding conformance"
- Previous message in Thread: Spiro: "WCAG 2.0 understanding conformance"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi
If those overlays made the website fully accessible, and if they let
the user review and use all the website content and services, they
would be an accessible solution.
The fact is that these overlays are either not accessible at all or
only offer users with disabilities access to a limited subset of the
website, in which case they don't enjoy the full and equal experience.
They used to try to have an "accessible website" version of popular
sites, but those ended up only offering a subset of the information
and oten did not have the same deals and offers as the main site.
On 2/6/21, Spiro < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I would like to ask experts opinion, and if it's possible from the WCAG 2.0
> members
>
> on the WCAG 2.0 understanding conformance
> https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/conformance.html under
> understanding requirement 5
>
> How this requirement addresses the overlays / supposedly accessible add
> ONS that are installed in so many websites and from what it seems to causes
> many Accessibility barriers for people with disabilities and specially for
> screen reader users.
>
> What I am trying to understand if this requirement is prohibit using this
> tools
>
> Thanks in advance
> > > > >
--
Work hard. Have fun. Make history.
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG 2.0 understanding conformance"
- Previous message: Spiro: "WCAG 2.0 understanding conformance"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: WCAG 2.0 understanding conformance"
- Previous message in Thread: Spiro: "WCAG 2.0 understanding conformance"
- View all messages in this Thread