E-mail List Archives
Re: SCs in certail scenarios
From: Sumit Patel
Date: Mar 11, 2021 11:17PM
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: SCs in certail scenarios"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: SCs in certail scenarios"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: SCs in certail scenarios"
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: SCs in certail scenarios"
- View all messages in this Thread
Here is my doubt. We are not even able to read the content. How can
we test the meaningful sequence of this content?
On 12/03/2021, glen walker < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Scenario 1 - It sounds like there might be an aria-hidden on the paragraph
> that is being skipped. I would use 1.3.2
> Scenario 2 - Using down arrow is a keyboard trap but using tab is not?
> That might also be an aria-hidden issue. I would use 1.3.2 again.
> Scenario 3 - Agreed, focus order 2.4.3
>
> Just my personal preference.
>
> Glen
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:08 AM Sumit Patel < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi experts,
>>
>> I have a query regarding which success criterias we need to fail in
>> certain scenarios. Please help me to end my confusions on this.
>>
>> Scenario 1:
>> when screen reader users navigate using arrow keys, screen reader is
>> skipping a whole paragraph. focus is directly going from previous para
>> to next para.
>>
>> Scenario 2:
>> in a model overlay, the first element is Done button. below contents
>> have provided. when screen reader users navigate using down arrow key,
>> focus is not going to the content. seems like it trapped in Done
>> button. But, tab focus is going to the links in the overlay. the
>> problem is only with arrow key navigation.
>>
>> Scenario 3:
>> In the model overlay, when they navigate using Tab key, focus is going
>> to the parent page. not looping inside the overlay.
>>
>> Usually I tend to fail it under
>> Scenario 1 - 1.3.1 Info and relationship
>> scenario 2 - 1.3.1 & 2.1.1 Keyboard trap
>> Scenario 3 - 2.4.3 focus order
>>
>> Thought to understand what I am doing is correct or not.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sumit
>> >> >> >> >>
> > > > >
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: SCs in certail scenarios"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: SCs in certail scenarios"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: SCs in certail scenarios"
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: SCs in certail scenarios"
- View all messages in this Thread