WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: a quick and easy to use faq builder for wp

for

From: Lucy GRECO
Date: Jan 6, 2022 9:59AM

looks like i got it working after all just one q do i need to set up
groups and i am write that the title is the q and the body is the answer
thanks lucy
Lucia Greco
Web Accessibility Evangelist
IST - Architecture, Platforms, and Integration
University of California, Berkeley
(510) 289-6008 skype: lucia1-greco
http://webaccess.berkeley.edu
Follow me on twitter @accessaces



On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:30 PM Amanda Rush < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
wrote:

> This FAQ plugin has some non-accordion options that will make the display a
> bit shorter and a bit more configurable. Note that each question and answer
> will need to be entered as a separate post under the FAQ section that will
> be added to the admin menu upon plugin activation. Can use block or
> shortcode for display.
>
> https://wordpress.org/plugins/quick-and-easy-faqs/
>
> Amanda
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of
> Lucy
> GRECO
> Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 6:19 PM
> To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] a quick and easy to use faq builder for wp
>
> they are not married to anything really they asked me for links to each q
> at
> the top when I expressed the thought that the faq was too long. it's over
> 17
> pages in word. a lawyer wrote it and it's really hard to parse its mee
> building and i want it to go fast smile so if you have something in mind
> that is accessible and that wont take me forever to use let me know thanks
> lucy Lucia Greco Web Accessibility Evangelist IST - Architecture,
> Platforms,
> and Integration University of California, Berkeley
> (510) 289-6008 skype: lucia1-greco
> http://webaccess.berkeley.edu
> Follow me on twitter @accessaces
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:46 PM Amanda Rush < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Lucy,
> >
> > There are accessible FAQ plugins I think, but not one that meets the
> > specifics you've listed below (FAQ accordion or tabs). There are some
> > inaccessible plugins that present less accessibility issues than
> > others, but I don't think any of them include the accordion or tabs
> > you're looking for.
> > (Note: I'm separating accordion and tabs as these are two distinct
> > types of component).
> > Is the non-profit you're working with married to either of these two,
> > or can they be flexible with regard to display as long as they have an
> > easy way to add to the FAQ?
> >
> >
> > Amanda
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of
> > Lucy GRECO
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 5:25 PM
> > To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> > Subject: [WebAIM] a quick and easy to use faq builder for wp
> >
> > hello:
> > I am on the board of a non profit that has given me the job of
> > building the web site. I could hand code it but I just don't have time
> > to do this. I am using word press to build the site and I am stuck at
> > the FAQ. Does anyone know of an easy to use and accessible faq plugin
> > that I can just cut and paste the faq into and it will create the
> > document for me.
> > They have asked me to use an accordion or a list of anchor links to
> > the q as it's a long long page to read. I would rather use a plugin to
> > do this so i don't have to code it every time they want to make
> > changes. I would like a simple interface that I can copy and paste
> > from as they are giving me everything from word. ideas please they are
> > willing to pay a small amount if needed to make it work lucy
> >
> >
> > Lucia Greco
> > Web Accessibility Evangelist
> > IST - Architecture, Platforms, and Integration University of
> > California, Berkeley
> > (510) 289-6008 skype: lucia1-greco
> > http://webaccess.berkeley.edu
> > Follow me on twitter @accessaces
> > > > > > archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> > > > > > > > archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> > > >
> > > at
> http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> > > > > >