E-mail List Archives
Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Aug 20, 2022 12:08PM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 20/08/2022 19:02, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> In this case, the "aA" text isn't really representing text/a word, but
> it's arguably more a graphic. So I wouldn't ding this under 2.5.3.
Ah, forgot that the understanding doc actually touches on this too
https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/label-in-name.html#symbolic-text-characters
Long story short, not a failure.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- View all messages in this Thread