E-mail List Archives
Re: Meaningful Sequende Question
From: Brooks Newton
Date: Dec 7, 2022 10:27AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Meaningful Sequende Question"
- Previous message: Pospelova Vera: "Re: Non-textual content: tables?"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Meaningful Sequende Question"
- Previous message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Meaningful Sequende Question"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi All,
Does anyone have a list of browsers and versions that correctly parse
aria-modal="true" so that the user's Tab sequence is properly constrained
within the container marked up with aria-modal="true" with no additional
custom focus management?
The reason why I ask has everything to do with user outcomes. I understand
that SC 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence in WCAG 2.x is passed if the Tab sequence
"can be programmatically determined." But just because it "can" doesn't
mean that the proper Tab sequence "will" be set if the browser/user agent
doesn't render the modal content using the content author's intended
interaction pattern.
Do content authors have any assurance that if they use the right page code
to pass SC 1.3.2 the Tab sequence will achieve an accessible result for
users with disabilities who use a keyboard or similar input approach?
Brooks
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:22 PM Birkir R. Gunnarsson <
<EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> If the content is visually presented as a dialog, it should have a
> dialog role. If it doesn't I'd fail it under WCAG 4.1.2 for not
> presenting its role.
> Also, if it isn't a dialog, what happens when you press tab with focus
> on the last interactive element in the dialog, where does the focus
> end up? Based on that it's possible that I might fail it under 2.4.3,
> but failing it under 1.3.2 would be a bit creative.
> I think there's a 95%+ chance the content is visually presented a a
> dialog/overlay/popover, what have you, and then it needs the dialog
> role (+ accessible name and aria-modal="true" if it is modal) for a
> screen reader user.
>
>
>
> On 12/6/22, Jim Homme < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> > Hi,
> > In the page under consideration, there is a link. When the user clicks
> the
> > link, content appears. Focus jumps to the content. In the HTML order,
> > though, the content is below the footer of the page. When the user hits a
> > Close button, focus jumps back to the link the user originally clicked.
> The
> > content below the page footer disappears. Question: would you fail the
> > content below the page footer for logical reading order?
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > =========> > Jim Homme
> > Senior Digital Accessibility Consultant
> > Bender Consulting Services
> > 412-787-8567
> > https://www.benderconsult.com/
> > Support the dreams of independence through employment for students with
> > disabilities with your Amazon purchases.
> > https://smile.amazon.com/ch/83-0988251
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
>
>
> --
> Work hard. Have fun. Make history.
> > > > >
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Meaningful Sequende Question"
- Previous message: Pospelova Vera: "Re: Non-textual content: tables?"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Meaningful Sequende Question"
- Previous message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Meaningful Sequende Question"
- View all messages in this Thread