E-mail List Archives
Re: Text That Looks Like A Link
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Mar 16, 2023 7:31PM
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- View all messages in this Thread
inventively re-reading normative wording to squeeze out a WCAG failure that isn't one is...not advisable. but you do you...
> On 17 Mar 2023, at 01:29, glen walker < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Yes, I get that, but it's not normative. I think Verena's idea was
> creative. I'm not sure I would go that route, but one could certainly argue
> for it especially if one really needed a WCAG failure to give the bug a
> higher priority.
>
> But if you read through the understanding document, and the examples,
>> there is zero mention of visual/presentational consistency. It focuses
>> on labelling/naming.
>>
>>
> > > >
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- View all messages in this Thread