E-mail List Archives
Re: Text That Looks Like A Link
From: glen walker
Date: Mar 16, 2023 10:37PM
- Next message: Jim Homme: "MS Word Text Box Work Around"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- Next message in Thread: Kevin Prince: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- View all messages in this Thread
> inventively re-reading normative wording to squeeze out a WCAG failure
> that isn't one is...not advisable. but you do you...
>
Me doing me would be "I'm not sure I would go that route", which sounds the
same as you saying it's "not advisable". Doesn't sound like we're
disagreeing in that respect.
But I do disagree that it's inventively re-reading. The guideline says
"identified consistently" and not "named consistently". As mentioned
before, 2.5.3 specifically says "name" so if 3.2.4 really meant "named
consistently", it should have said so. There must have been a reason
"identified" was chosen over "named".
- Next message: Jim Homme: "MS Word Text Box Work Around"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- Next message in Thread: Kevin Prince: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Text That Looks Like A Link"
- View all messages in this Thread