E-mail List Archives
WC3 Example #1 of tagging acronym expansion text yields a yellow warning on the PAC checker.
From: Laura Roberts
Date: Dec 15, 2023 1:00PM
- Next message: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: WC3 Example #1 of tagging acronym expansion text yields a yellow warning on the PAC checker."
- Previous message: Lucy Greco: "Re: WebAIM Screen Reader User Survey"
- Next message in Thread: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: WC3 Example #1 of tagging acronym expansion text yields a yellow warning on the PAC checker."
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
From WC3 on tagging acronyms:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Techniques/pdf/PDF8.html#:~:text=In%20a%20tagged%20PDF%20document,create%20a%20new%20Span%20tag
.
Example #1 of tagging acronym expansion text yields a yellow warning on the
PAC checker.
The warning is: Possibly inappropriate of a span structure element.
If you don't use the span tag at all for the word, then the screen readers
read the expansion text just fine and you get no PAC errors.
Anyone have some insight into this?
--
Best regards,
Laura Roberts
413-588-8422
- Next message: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: WC3 Example #1 of tagging acronym expansion text yields a yellow warning on the PAC checker."
- Previous message: Lucy Greco: "Re: WebAIM Screen Reader User Survey"
- Next message in Thread: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: WC3 Example #1 of tagging acronym expansion text yields a yellow warning on the PAC checker."
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread