E-mail List Archives
Re: competing audio
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Apr 16, 2024 8:35AM
- Next message: Brian Lovely: "Meaningful Sequence in SPAs"
- Previous message: Mike Warner: "competing audio"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Mike Warner: "competing audio"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 16/04/2024 14:55, Mike Warner wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> while working on the interactive transcript feature that I'd
> previously mentioned, I noticed that JWplayer announces the timestamp and
> time left in the video when the scrub bar is moved., either manually or
> when javascript tells it to go to a specific timestamp That announcement
> competes with the sound from the video. Would that be a failure for
> success criteria 1.4.7 ?
No, as 1.4.7 Low or No Background Audio (AAA) isn't about parallel but
separate audio sources.
> A demo page where this can be observed is:
> https://staging-b2b-setup.annoto.net/demos/jw-portals-demo.html
[...]
> That's quite a bit of speech output and makes the user miss a few seconds
> of the video's audio.
The fact it double-announces the time is a bit unfortunate and could do
with being looked into (likely a combination of a live region and the
announcement of the actual slider value itself). However, having this
announcement will be essential for SR users, so a difficult circle to
square.
Anecdotally, screen reader users are very good at
isolating/distinguishing different sound streams, even concurrent ones
(within reason, of course).
If it proves too noisy/competing, users can also pause the video first
before scrubbing.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
* https://www.splintered.co.uk/
* https://github.com/patrickhlauke
* https://flickr.com/photos/redux/
* https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Brian Lovely: "Meaningful Sequence in SPAs"
- Previous message: Mike Warner: "competing audio"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Mike Warner: "competing audio"
- View all messages in this Thread