E-mail List Archives
Re: Re[2]: Include default text?
From: reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
Date: Oct 21, 2004 8:50PM
- Next message: Andrew Arch: "Re: Re[2]: Include default text?"
- Previous message: lister: "Re: Re[2]: Include default text?"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Arch: "Re: Re[2]: Include default text?"
- Previous message in Thread: lister: "Re: Re[2]: Include default text?"
- View all messages in this Thread
This leads me to a question I've been meaning to ask. I have
accessibility statements on my sites with a link to them in the footer
of all pages (and a link to privacy statements), and also use a
meta-tag
<link rel="help" href="http://www.whateversite.com/access.html"
title="Our Accessibility Information and Key Legend" />
1) How do people feel about not have the accessibility link above the fold?
2) How do people feel about using the to point to
an accessibility page?
Thanks - Susan
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:33:08 -0700, lister wrote:
>
> This has been a good icon discussion which I think could be tied to the
> "making a business case for accessibility" issue Glenda brought up several
> days ago. While an icon should not replace a good accessibility statement,
> the "placard" aspect of an icon provides something upper management can see
> (and point to) for their investment in accessibility. I agree it would be
> best left out of the way on an accessibility statement, rather than on every
> page. Of course, it also promotes accessibility and standards in general...
> when someone sees it for the first time it may turn them on to the whole
> movement!
>
> .matt
>
>
>
>
- Next message: Andrew Arch: "Re: Re[2]: Include default text?"
- Previous message: lister: "Re: Re[2]: Include default text?"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Arch: "Re: Re[2]: Include default text?"
- Previous message in Thread: lister: "Re: Re[2]: Include default text?"
- View all messages in this Thread