E-mail List Archives
Re: WAI Icons. Was: Include default text?
From: Iain Harrison
Date: Oct 22, 2004 6:21AM
- Next message: Athol Gow: "Re: Pricing of Screen Readers"
- Previous message: Chris Heilmann: "WAI Icons. Was: Include default text?"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Arch: "Re: WAI Icons. Was: Include default text?"
- Previous message in Thread: Chris Heilmann: "WAI Icons. Was: Include default text?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:11:34 AM, lists38 wrote:
>> I disagree. The icons raise the profile of standards-compliance, and
>> make it more of a live issue. That benefits all disabled people.
> Standard Compliance with Guidelines? There is no accessibility standard,
> both wai and 508 are guidelines, and with good reason, as accessibility is
> nothing to tick off or have machine tested.
That's why I would put w3c standards-compliance icons on, but would
not put icons about accessibility claims onto a web page.
Would you really want to advertise having used something as naff as Bobby?
--
Iain
- Next message: Athol Gow: "Re: Pricing of Screen Readers"
- Previous message: Chris Heilmann: "WAI Icons. Was: Include default text?"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Arch: "Re: WAI Icons. Was: Include default text?"
- Previous message in Thread: Chris Heilmann: "WAI Icons. Was: Include default text?"
- View all messages in this Thread