E-mail List Archives
Re: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions
From: reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
Date: Nov 8, 2004 5:59PM
- Next message: Iain Harrison: "Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- Previous message: Iain Harrison: "Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Iain Harrison: "Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- View all messages in this Thread
> I'd rather hoped for some feedback about the "skip to content" and
> "site map" links which use accesskeys and are almost invisible in
> sighted browsers that support CSS. I'm not sure I've got them right.
I use "Skip to Main Content" link now after reading the recent
articles about the "semantics" fo the terms we genearlly use in these.
i always makw the links visible to all users (not tiny) beasue I fell
they have value to all users and that it re-inforces to users that the
web is for all.
As for the site map - I'm a firm beleiver in having a text based site
map above the fold visible for all readers too. I beleive a such is
becoming a standard, one that I endorse since it's valuable to all.
So,,, feedback from me is that I like them, just make them bigger and
remove the drop-down link to site map from your menu.
Just my personal opinion.
--
Susan R. Grossman
<EMAIL REMOVED>
- Next message: Iain Harrison: "Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- Previous message: Iain Harrison: "Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Iain Harrison: "Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- View all messages in this Thread