E-mail List Archives
Re: Rethinking "Skip to Content"
From: michael.brockington
Date: Dec 3, 2004 9:57AM
- Next message: Dagmar Noll: "Re: Rethinking "Skip to Content""
- Previous message: Patrick Lauke: "Re: Rethinking "Skip to Content""
- Next message in Thread: Dagmar Noll: "Re: Rethinking "Skip to Content""
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick Lauke: "Re: Rethinking "Skip to Content""
- View all messages in this Thread
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark.magennis [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Rethinking "Skip to Content"
>
> Incidentally, you could drop the "Go to" and the "web" parts
> of your link titles because they are implicit. You only need
> "Page content" and "Site menu".
Any time that you use the word 'implicit' in such a context you should beware
of excluding users with cognitive disabilities - excessive verbosity can be a
problem for them, but so can over abreviation.
Accessibility is not just about JAWS' idiosyncracies.
Mike
********************************************************************
This email may contain information which is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender immediately and delete it without reading, copying, storing, forwarding or disclosing its contents to any other person
Thank you
Check us out at http://www.bt.com/consulting
********************************************************************
- Next message: Dagmar Noll: "Re: Rethinking "Skip to Content""
- Previous message: Patrick Lauke: "Re: Rethinking "Skip to Content""
- Next message in Thread: Dagmar Noll: "Re: Rethinking "Skip to Content""
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick Lauke: "Re: Rethinking "Skip to Content""
- View all messages in this Thread