E-mail List Archives
Re: Alternate Accessible Versions?
From: Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC
Date: Feb 7, 2005 6:10AM
- Next message: reply-to:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;: "Voice Controlled Assistive Technology"
- Previous message: michael.brockington: "Re: Welcome to the WebAIM Discussion List"
- Next message in Thread: Cheryl D Wise: "Re: Alternate Accessible Versions?"
- Previous message in Thread: michael.brockington: "Re: Alternate Accessible Versions?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Mike,
Thanks for taking the time to explain. I think I see my
disconnect.
I was making the assumption that ALL content was accessible, and
that the alternates were equally accessible, but tailored for a specific
purpose (such as printing or specific to an end-user's needs for
accessibility, targeting increased usability for that user.
Alternates are to be used only when the primary content *cannot*
be made accessible. Alternates should not be used as a method to avoid
having to build in accessibility into the primary web content.
Thanks for the discussion,
Norman
- Next message: reply-to:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;: "Voice Controlled Assistive Technology"
- Previous message: michael.brockington: "Re: Welcome to the WebAIM Discussion List"
- Next message in Thread: Cheryl D Wise: "Re: Alternate Accessible Versions?"
- Previous message in Thread: michael.brockington: "Re: Alternate Accessible Versions?"
- View all messages in this Thread