E-mail List Archives
Re: headings
From: Karen Currier
Date: Feb 17, 2005 3:00PM
- Next message: drs18: "Re: headings"
- Previous message: Glenda: "Re: headings"
- Next message in Thread: drs18: "Re: headings"
- Previous message in Thread: Glenda: "Re: headings"
- View all messages in this Thread
Do you know Patrick, I'll have to admit that I've not tried to put a
into a web page on it's own and then run it through the validators! But
from what I've understood it's best to have a followed by and so
on for each page. Even if they're just repeating headings that appeared on
another page, it helps the user understand what the is a sub-heading of
within the website (especially for users who haven't started on page 1) for
example:
Title of the website
Title of this section
Title of this page
Thanks for reminding me that validators aren't perfect :-)
All the best
Karen
-----Original Message-----
From: redux [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
Sent: 17 February 2005 21:41
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] headings
karen wrote:
> To correctly valid your web page you cannot have a appear on a web
page
> without a and a preceding it.
What validation are we talking about? W3C's XHTML validator? In that
case, I'm afraid that's not correct...it will quite happily accept an
even without higher level headings before it. Of course, if it's
valid from a logic/structure point of view is another matter entirely...
--
Patrick H. Lauke
_____________________________________________________
re.dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
----
To subscribe or unsubscribe, visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: drs18: "Re: headings"
- Previous message: Glenda: "Re: headings"
- Next message in Thread: drs18: "Re: headings"
- Previous message in Thread: Glenda: "Re: headings"
- View all messages in this Thread