E-mail List Archives
RE: Accessible portals
From: Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC
Date: Jun 10, 2005 1:42PM
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "RE: Accessible portals"
- Previous message: Stewart, Ron: "RE: Accessible portals"
- Next message in Thread: Jon Gunderson: "RE: Accessible portals"
- Previous message in Thread: Stewart, Ron: "RE: Accessible portals"
- View all messages in this Thread
Ron,
Thanks for sharing!
I see a big disconnect between the evaluation, 508 compliance,
WAI testing, and usability in this report. There are a few
characterizations I'd like to mention, such as the reference to frames
and default screen reader use. Section 508 compliance only requires the
frames be titled appropriately. Other issues, such as the JavaScript
reference are inconsistent - even if the screen reader can access the
information with JavaScript, it may not be 508 compliant. This is
addressed by section 508, 1194.22(l) "When pages utilized scripting...".
Please don't take these as negative, just observations.
I guess it is just a pet peeve of mine; 508 compliance is not
equal to WAI, usability, or end-user access via assistive technology!
I'm curious as to if you have your own guidelines you are using to test
against? Is the application available on the Internet now for public
review?
Regards,
Norman Robinson
-----Original Message-----
From: <EMAIL REMOVED>
[mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Stewart, Ron
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 2:38 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: RE: [WebAIM] Accessible portals
We just completed an evaluation of the Luminis Portal system, since
Oregon State is considering its adoption.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: <EMAIL REMOVED>
[mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Janet Perkins
Corbett
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 11:33 AM
To: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Subject: [WebAIM] Accessible portals
As with all claims, it's good to actually check out the level of
accessibility. SCT/Luminis portal developers also make the same claim
re: W3C's WAI guidelines, but they just BARELY meet Level 1 guidelines.
A bit off-topic: And if an institution asks SCT for better
accessibility, they call it an "enhancement" and refer to their
accounting dept. (yes, I'm still fuming)
>PHPWebSite - [http://phpwebsite.sourceforge.net]
>From their page... Developed by the Web Technology Group at
>Appalachian State University, phpWebSite provides a complete web site
>content management system ( CMS ). All client output is XHTML 1.0 and
>meets the W3Cs Web Accessibility Initiative requirements.
>This is the only CMS I have ever come across that even makes such a
claim.
>Michael Roush, Technology Consultant
Janet Perkins Corbett
Wyoming INstitute for Disabilities
http://wind.uwyo.edu/
(307)766-2506
<EMAIL REMOVED>
Don't SAY things. What you ARE stands over you the while, and thunders
so that I cannot hear what you say to the contrary.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
_______________________________________________
To manage your subscription, visit http://list.webaim.org/ Address list
messages to <EMAIL REMOVED>
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "RE: Accessible portals"
- Previous message: Stewart, Ron: "RE: Accessible portals"
- Next message in Thread: Jon Gunderson: "RE: Accessible portals"
- Previous message in Thread: Stewart, Ron: "RE: Accessible portals"
- View all messages in this Thread