E-mail List Archives
RE: Long form legends
From: Steven Faulkner
Date: Jun 10, 2005 2:10PM
- Next message: Thomas Jedenfelt: "RE: Long form legends"
- Previous message: Richard Garbutt: "Lengthy branding text as image"
- Next message in Thread: Thomas Jedenfelt: "RE: Long form legends"
- Previous message in Thread: Richard Garbutt: "Re: Long form legends"
- View all messages in this Thread
Jukka "Yucca" Korpela wrote:
>Contrary to what the
> cited document
> claims, the <legend> element is _not_ optional. It is required by HTML
> syntax, see
> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/forms.html#h-17.10
> (Even the spec is misleading: it says that "The LEGEND element allows
> authors to assign a caption to a FIELDSET", but by the formal syntax,
> <legend> is required.)
Does this mean that the W3C validator is incorrect when it says a xhtml
1.0 transitional document containing a fieldset element without a legend
element is valid?
with regards
Steven Faulkner
Web Accessibility Consultant
National Information & Library Service (NILS)
454 Glenferrie Road
Kooyong Victoria 3144
Phone: (613) 9864 9281
Fax: (613) 9864 9210
Email: <EMAIL REMOVED>
National Information Library Service
A subsidiary of RBS.RVIB.VAF Ltd.
>
- Next message: Thomas Jedenfelt: "RE: Long form legends"
- Previous message: Richard Garbutt: "Lengthy branding text as image"
- Next message in Thread: Thomas Jedenfelt: "RE: Long form legends"
- Previous message in Thread: Richard Garbutt: "Re: Long form legends"
- View all messages in this Thread