E-mail List Archives
RE: word verification
From: Glenda Watson Hyatt
Date: Feb 9, 2006 12:15PM
- Next message: Cynthia Waddell: "RE: Target being sued over inaccessible web site"
- Previous message: Austin, Darrel: "RE: word verification"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "RE: word verification"
- View all messages in this Thread
Jukka wrote:
This is quite a puzzle. But any solution that requires the user to prove
he is human by his ability to see or to know things or to do things is
bound to discriminate against many people. There is no _single_ external
activity that is necessary and sufficient to classify a being as human.
Glenda adds:
I agree. In writing the article on CAPTCHAs, the only interim solution that
I came up with is to offer a variety of CAPTCHAs and, hopefully, the user
will be able to use one of them. Admittedly, this is very clumsy, but it
may have to do until a "more accessible" solution is developed. Ideally we
wouldn't need this darn things.
I find it ironic that we need tests to differentiate between computers and
humans when its humans who are developing these robots to act like humans.
Can't "we" simply stop doing this to ourselves???
Cheers,
Glenda
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.4/255 - Release Date: 2/9/2006
- Next message: Cynthia Waddell: "RE: Target being sued over inaccessible web site"
- Previous message: Austin, Darrel: "RE: word verification"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "RE: word verification"
- View all messages in this Thread