E-mail List Archives
RE: spacing - versus clear images
From: Karl Groves
Date: Mar 7, 2006 9:10AM
- Next message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: spacing - versus clear images"
- Previous message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: spacing - versus clear images"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: spacing - versus clear images"
- Previous message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: spacing - versus clear images"
- View all messages in this Thread
<spacer> is not now, nor was it ever part of any official spec. It is a
proprietary element from the bad ole days of the browser wars and, AFAIK it
is no longer supported by *any* user agent, resting in its well-deserved
grave much like its buddies <blink> and <layer>.
Authoring standards-compliant markup should be the first step toward
accessibility (which is the purpose of this list). But regardless of your
opinions on validity, the fact remains that a method exists which is better
and more accessible than anything discussed thus far. Instead of ,
spacer images, or proprietary markup, why not a little CSS margin or
padding? All modern user agents support it, it is accessible, and much
easier to maintain.
Karl L. Groves
User-Centered Design, Inc.
Office: 703-729-0998
Mobile: 571-214-1714
E-Mail: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Web: http://www.user-centereddesign.com
>
- Next message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: spacing - versus clear images"
- Previous message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: spacing - versus clear images"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: spacing - versus clear images"
- Previous message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: spacing - versus clear images"
- View all messages in this Thread