E-mail List Archives
Re: spacing - versus clear images
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Mar 7, 2006 3:10PM
- Next message: John Foliot - WATS.ca: "Code Validation (was RE: spacing - versus clear images)"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: spacing - versus clear images"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: spacing - versus clear images"
- View all messages in this Thread
Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote:
>> As a general rule of thumb, the more compliant the markup is,
>> the more accessible to more devices it would be.
>
> That is the general idea, but I'm not sure that it is actually
> defensible. Are there any browsers that _require_ valid HTML? If not,
> are you saying that there is no way to write a page that will display
> and read (when applicable) correctly in these without that page being
> valid? I'm not asking whether it is easier or not, just whether the
> statement is accurate.
Once you go outside of the spec, you're effectively at the mercy of each
individual browser's error correction/compensation mechanisms, which can
vary considerably. This increases the likelihood that your page breaks
apart or otherwise fails to display correctly.
--
Patrick H. Lauke
___________
re
- Next message: John Foliot - WATS.ca: "Code Validation (was RE: spacing - versus clear images)"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: spacing - versus clear images"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: spacing - versus clear images"
- View all messages in this Thread