E-mail List Archives
Thread: Comparing WCAG 1 & WCAG 2
Number of posts in this thread: 4 (In chronological order)
From: Paul Collins
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 5:10AM
Subject: Comparing WCAG 1 & WCAG 2
No previous message | Next message →
Hi all,
Sorry for this post, but I've searched the WebAIM archives and can't
find it. Someone posted up a great page here recently where they'd
compared the old and new versions of WCAG - matching the new
guidelines with their previous counterparts.
Does anyone have that link?
Thanks,
Paul
From: Christophe Strobbe
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 5:20AM
Subject: Re: Comparing WCAG 1 & WCAG 2
← Previous message | Next message →
Hi Paul,
At 13:03 17/06/2008, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Sorry for this post, but I've searched the WebAIM archives and can't
>find it. Someone posted up a great page here recently where they'd
>compared the old and new versions of WCAG - matching the new
>guidelines with their previous counterparts.
Do you mean Roger Hudson's "Migrating from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0"
<http://wipa.org.au/papers/wcag-migration.htm>;?
Best regards,
Christophe
--
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
---
Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other
"social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but
I haven't.
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
From: carmen.strode
Date: Tue, Jun 17 2008 5:30AM
Subject: Re: Comparing WCAG 1 & WCAG 2
← Previous message | Next message →
Hi Paul -
Is this what you are looking for?
http://wipa.org.au/papers/wcag-migration.htm
Carmen
Carmen Strode
Interaction Designer
Technical Steering Group
ACI Worldwide
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential,
proprietary or non-public information. This information is intended solely
for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error
has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately and
destroy this e-mail. Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this
information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed
in this e-mail are those of the author personally.
ACI Worldwide (EMEA) Limited. Registered in England and Wales (registered
no. 2310474). Registered Office: 59 Clarendon Road, Watford,
Hertfordshire, WD17 1FQ, United Kingdom
"Paul Collins" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent by: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
17-Jun-2008 12:04 PM
Please respond to
WebAIM Discussion List < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To
"WebAIM Discussion List" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
cc
Subject
[WebAIM] Comparing WCAG 1 & WCAG 2
Hi all,
Sorry for this post, but I've searched the WebAIM archives and can't
find it. Someone posted up a great page here recently where they'd
compared the old and new versions of WCAG - matching the new
guidelines with their previous counterparts.
Does anyone have that link?
Thanks,
Paul
From: Paul Collins
Date: Wed, Jun 18 2008 5:50AM
Subject: Re: Comparing WCAG 1 & WCAG 2
← Previous message | No next message
Sorry for the delay in replying.
That's the one, thanks to both of you....
It's going in the Bookmarks this time!
2008/6/17 Christophe Strobbe < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >:
> Hi Paul,
>
> At 13:03 17/06/2008, you wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Sorry for this post, but I've searched the WebAIM archives and can't
>>find it. Someone posted up a great page here recently where they'd
>>compared the old and new versions of WCAG - matching the new
>>guidelines with their previous counterparts.
>
> Do you mean Roger Hudson's "Migrating from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0"
> <http://wipa.org.au/papers/wcag-migration.htm>;?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Christophe
>
>
>
> --
> Christophe Strobbe
> K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
> Research Group on Document Architectures
> Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
> B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
> BELGIUM
> tel: +32 16 32 85 51
> http://www.docarch.be/
> ---
> Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other
> "social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but
> I haven't.
>
>
> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
>
>