E-mail List Archives

Search E-mail List Archives for

Number of posts in this thread: 1 (In chronological order)

From: surbhi Mudgal
Date: Sun, Jul 17 2016 3:36AM
Subject: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 136, Issue 17
No previous message | No next message

Hi All,

Good Day.

My great thanks to all for the valuable response.


Thanks & Regards,
Surbhi Mudgal.

On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:30 PM, < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
wrote:

> Send WebAIM-Forum mailing list submissions to
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://list.webaim.org/mailman/listinfo/webaim-forum
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of WebAIM-Forum digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Web applicationtesting (Caitlin Geier)
> 2. Accessibility user testing (Zack McCartney)
> 3. Re: Accessibility user testing (Lucy Greco)
> 4. Re: Web applicationtesting (Bossley, Pete)
> 5. Re: wcag 3.3.4 (Maxability Accessibility for all)
> 6. Re: wcag 3.3.4 (Bhaskarjyoti Hazarika)
> 7. Re: Web applicationtesting (Maxability Accessibility for all)
> 8. Re: Accessibility user testing (Maxability Accessibility for all)
> 9. Re: Question on the alt text for images... (Mike Barlow)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Caitlin Geier < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> To: WebAIM Discussion List < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:16:31 -0400
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Web applicationtesting
> Dylan Barrell (Deque's CTO) gave a talk awhile back about automated testing
> <https://vimeo.com/151658306> which includes data about some of Deque's
> research around browser / AT combinations. About ~15 minutes into the video
> is our browser / AT testing matrix. Essentially, while it's ideal to test
> as many combinations as possible, there's usually a limited amount of time
> in which to do testing. The reasoning behind targeting certain combinations
> over others is to get the most bang for your buck - to catch the most
> issues in the least amount of time. The combinations used most frequently
> at Deque are based on support (NVDA is better on Firefox than on Chrome,
> for example) and on accuracy (NVDA presents what's actually there, while
> JAWS sometimes guesses).
>
> I haven't been able to find an accessible version of the matrix in the
> video. The top browser/AT combinations listed are:
>
> - Firefox (for Windows) / keyboard
> - Firefox (for Windows) / NVDA
> - Safari / Voiceover (desktop and mobile)
> - Firefox (for Android) / Talkback
> - Firefox (for Linux) / Orca
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Andrews, David B (DEED) <
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
>
> > I went to a session at CSUN this year, about this very topic. Don't
> > remember who gave it, (getting old I guess,) and as I recall they of
> course
> > recommended testing as many combinations as you could, which is good
> > advice. As I recall, they said if you could only test one combo your
> best
> > bet was NVDA/Firefox. I would add if you can add a second, it should
> > probably be IE/JAWS.
> >
> > You can go too far down this rabbit hole, or simplify it too much, from
> my
> > experience.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > David Andrews | Chief Technology Officer
> > Department of Employment and Economic Development
> > State Services for the Blind, 2200 University Ave. W., Suite 240, St.
> Paul
> > MN 55114
> > Direct: 651-539-2294 | Mobile: 612-730-7931
> > Web | Twitter | Facebook
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >