E-mail List Archives
Thread: access key
Number of posts in this thread: 7 (In chronological order)
From: Konstantine
Date: Sat, Dec 31 2005 5:40AM
Subject: access key
No previous message | Next message →
Greetings
Is there a source collating access key handling for different user agents?
Regards
konstantine
From: John Foliot - WATS.ca
Date: Sat, Dec 31 2005 7:00AM
Subject: RE: access key
← Previous message | Next message →
Konstantine wrote:
> Greetings
> Is there a source collating access key handling for different user
> agents? Regards konstantine
Using Accesskeys - Is it worth it?:
http://www.wats.ca/articles/accesskeys/19
More reasons why we don't use accesskeys:
http://www.wats.ca/articles/accesskeyconflicts/37
Accesskeys and Reserved Keystroke Combinations:
http://www.wats.ca/resources/accesskeysandkeystrokes/38
Link Relationships as an Alternative to Accesskeys:
http://www.wats.ca/articles/accesskeyalternatives/52
The Future of Accesskeys:
http://www.wats.ca/articles/thefutureofaccesskeys/66
Access + Key still = Accesskey: The XHTML Role Access Module
still flawed:
http://www.wats.ca/articles/xhtmlroleaccessmodulestillflawed/80
JF
--
John Foliot = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca
Web Accessibility Testing and Services
http://www.wats.ca
Phone: 1-613-482-7053
From: Konstantine
Date: Sat, Dec 31 2005 7:40AM
Subject: Re: access key
← Previous message | Next message →
On 12/31/05, John Foliot - WATS.ca < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
> Using Accesskeys - Is it worth it?:
> http://www.wats.ca/articles/accesskeys/19
>
> More reasons why we don't use accesskeys:
> http://www.wats.ca/articles/accesskeyconflicts/37
>
> Accesskeys and Reserved Keystroke Combinations:
> http://www.wats.ca/resources/accesskeysandkeystrokes/38
>
> Link Relationships as an Alternative to Accesskeys:
> http://www.wats.ca/articles/accesskeyalternatives/52
>
> The Future of Accesskeys:
> http://www.wats.ca/articles/thefutureofaccesskeys/66
>
> Access + Key still = Accesskey: The XHTML Role Access Module
> still flawed:
> http://www.wats.ca/articles/xhtmlroleaccessmodulestillflawed/80
Hi
Thanks for the reply. I have already been through the wats.ca
articles. Gratitudes to authors. The third link fits the bill but I
was looking for something more recent if it does exist.
Thanks and happy new year
K.
From: Tim Beadle
Date: Sat, Dec 31 2005 8:20AM
Subject: Re: access key
← Previous message | Next message →
On 31/12/05, Konstantine < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
> Hi
> Thanks for the reply. I have already been through the wats.ca
> articles. Gratitudes to authors. The third link fits the bill but I
> was looking for something more recent if it does exist.
> Thanks and happy new year
I think John's subtle advice was "don't use accesskeys", as the
implementation in browsers is seriously flawed.
Happy new year,
Tim
From: John Foliot - WATS.ca
Date: Sat, Dec 31 2005 9:00AM
Subject: RE: access key
← Previous message | Next message →
Tim Beadle wrote:
>
> I think John's subtle advice was "don't use accesskeys", as the
> implementation in browsers is seriously flawed.
Or not so subtle! <smile> Konstantine, I strongly urge you to not use
accesskeys. If you absolutely feel you need to provide this type of
functionality, I suggest you check out Gez Lemon's slick solution here:
User-Defined Access Keys (PHP Version):
http://juicystudio.com/article/user-defined-accesskeys.php
User-Defined Access Keys (ASP Version):
http://juicystudio.com/article/user-defined-access-keys-aspversion.php
Happy New Year All!
JF
--
John Foliot = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca
Web Accessibility Testing and Services
http://www.wats.ca
Phone: 1-613-482-7053
From: Konstantine
Date: Mon, Jan 02 2006 11:40AM
Subject: Re: access key
← Previous message | Next message →
On 12/31/05, Tim Beadle < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
> I think John's subtle advice was "don't use accesskeys", as the
> implementation in browsers is seriously flawed.
Ah! I see. Promise I had good intentions only [smile]. I certainly do
not wish to make things harder by implemeting something that should
make life easier.
Thanks for your time
Regards
K.
.
From: Konstantine
Date: Mon, Jan 02 2006 12:20PM
Subject: Re: access key
← Previous message | No next message
On 12/31/05, John Foliot - WATS.ca < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
> Or not so subtle! <smile> Konstantine, I strongly urge you to not use
> accesskeys.
Hi John
Thanks for the clarification. I was hoping the situation would have
changed for the better since the articles were published. Obviously
not.
> If you absolutely feel you need to provide this type of
> functionality, I suggest you check out Gez Lemon's slick solution here:
Nice one, but unfortunately I do not have server-side options with the
site am building. I was going to define keys 1-6 only, for main
navigation links but I see it may cause more harm than good. I will go
with your advise and remove them and hope (naively?) there will be a
universal solution someday.
Thanks for your time
Regards
K.