E-mail List Archives
Thread: html version
Number of posts in this thread: 2 (In chronological order)
From: Paul Collins
Date: Thu, Feb 16 2006 10:15AM
Subject: html version
No previous message | Next message →
Hi all,
Thanks for the comments about the Flash Image library last week. We've managed to start building an Accessible Flash version and a html version, both pulling the content from the same XML file. All images come with their own description so this will meet the Alt tag requirements.
My question is, how do we name the links between the two versions? Should we call it "HTML version" and "Flash version"? Do most people know the difference these days? We can't really call it a "text version" as it contains images and we shouldn't really call it an "Accessible version" as the Flash will also be deemed accessible to those who can use it.
Would love to hear some thoughts from anyone who has an idea of best practice?
Cheers again,
Paul
From: Karl Groves
Date: Thu, Feb 16 2006 3:00PM
Subject: RE: html version
← Previous message | No next message
>