E-mail List Archives
Thread: Accessible Politics
Number of posts in this thread: 3 (In chronological order)
From: John E. Brandt
Date: Tue, Feb 13 2007 7:00PM
Subject: Accessible Politics
No previous message | Next message →
Wouldn't it be great to have at least one campaign website that meets
accessibility standards?
I just ran a little accessibility "test" on some of the websites of the
"major" US presidential candidates and a few of the exploratory campaign
sites. I've posted the sad results on my blog:
http://www.jebswebs.com/jebsblog/tabid/53/EntryID/37/Default.aspx
John E. Brandt
Augusta, Maine USA
www.jebswebs.com
From: Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC
Date: Wed, Feb 14 2007 10:30AM
Subject: Re: Accessible Politics
← Previous message | Next message →
I noticed you annotated these as errors. Automated testing tools
are notorious for warnings that aren't accessibility issues; just asking
if you can qualify the severity or degree of their errors? I thought
your blog entry would be better if you could qualify them, such as you
did generically with the input form issue.
I looked at one or two and offered to speak to their web teams
or vendors or in-house staff. While I don't necessary support anyone in
particular, they all should be as inclusive as possible. If anyone else
here gets a response and needs help, please don't hesitate to ask; I'm
glad to help if I can.
Regards,
Norman B. Robinson
a.k.a., = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = as the offer for help is
personal efforts on my personal time.
From: smithj7
Date: Wed, Feb 14 2007 9:10PM
Subject: Re: Accessible Politics
← Previous message | No next message
I haven't looked yet. As a developer I LOVE tools to hit the highlights and
help ensure some level of accessiblity. However, 99 percent of the time
when I help a person fix a site to make it more accessible it is the
USEABLITY that is an issue and the folks could have passed the tool. I'm
sure most of the folks know tons of examples.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Accessible Politics
>
>
> I noticed you annotated these as errors. Automated testing tools
> are notorious for warnings that aren't accessibility issues; just asking
> if you can qualify the severity or degree of their errors? I thought
> your blog entry would be better if you could qualify them, such as you
> did generically with the input form issue.
>
> I looked at one or two and offered to speak to their web teams
> or vendors or in-house staff. While I don't necessary support anyone in
> particular, they all should be as inclusive as possible. If anyone else
> here gets a response and needs help, please don't hesitate to ask; I'm
> glad to help if I can.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Norman B. Robinson
> a.k.a., = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = as the offer for help is
> personal efforts on my personal time.
>
>