WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: Page verses document

for

Number of posts in this thread: 5 (In chronological order)

From: Corbett, James
Date: Fri, Oct 26 2012 10:32AM
Subject: Page verses document
No previous message | Next message →

Hello:

I'm well versed in the WCAG 2.0 AA criteria where it applies to a static web page and or forms but I'm a bit bewildered when it comes to a html document.

Let's just assume we have a plain document, no particular formatting to speak of, no bullets or any headings. Would the same WCAG criteria apply to this document?

Your thoughts please.

Jim

James Corbett
IT Developer - Analyst
ITB/Solutions/BP&A/DevCentre/Developer Tools and Horizontal Initiatives Services
613 941-9355 | facsimile / télécopieur 613-954-9222
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Canada Revenue Agency | 875 Heron Rd Rm H4-177, Ottawa ON K1A OL8
Agence du revenu du Canada | 875 chemin Heron, ch H4-177 Ottawa ON K1A 0L8
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada

"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."
Oscar Wilde

From: Jared Smith
Date: Fri, Oct 26 2012 10:35AM
Subject: Re: Page verses document
← Previous message | Next message →

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Corbett, James wrote:

> Would the same WCAG criteria apply to this document?

If it is "web content", then WCAG would apply. If it is a txt file,
then it would only be necessary to implement the accessibility
requirements that are possible in that particular format.

Jared

From: Lucy Greco
Date: Fri, Oct 26 2012 11:23AM
Subject: Re: Page verses document
← Previous message | Next message →

The only thing I would wonder is if it has no markup like headings should
it navigation is always a good idea the only time I can think of not having
any markup is on a simple paragraph

-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Corbett, James
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 9:32 AM
To: W-Aim ( = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = )
Subject: [WebAIM] Page verses document

Hello:

I'm well versed in the WCAG 2.0 AA criteria where it applies to a static web
page and or forms but I'm a bit bewildered when it comes to a html document.

Let's just assume we have a plain document, no particular formatting to
speak of, no bullets or any headings. Would the same WCAG criteria apply to
this document?

Your thoughts please.

Jim

James Corbett
IT Developer - Analyst
ITB/Solutions/BP&A/DevCentre/Developer Tools and Horizontal Initiatives
Services
613 941-9355 | facsimile / télécopieur 613-954-9222
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Canada Revenue Agency | 875 Heron Rd Rm H4-177, Ottawa ON K1A OL8
Agence du revenu du Canada | 875 chemin Heron, ch H4-177 Ottawa ON K1A 0L8
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada

"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."
Oscar Wilde

From: Corbett, James
Date: Fri, Oct 26 2012 11:31AM
Subject: Re: Page verses document
← Previous message | Next message →

Lucy:

...but does "should and could have" violate WCAG 2.0 AA criteria.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Lucy Greco
Sent: October 26, 2012 1:24 PM
To: 'WebAIM Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Page verses document

The only thing I would wonder is if it has no markup like headings should
it navigation is always a good idea the only time I can think of not having
any markup is on a simple paragraph

-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Corbett, James
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 9:32 AM
To: W-Aim ( = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = )
Subject: [WebAIM] Page verses document

Hello:

I'm well versed in the WCAG 2.0 AA criteria where it applies to a static web
page and or forms but I'm a bit bewildered when it comes to a html document.

Let's just assume we have a plain document, no particular formatting to
speak of, no bullets or any headings. Would the same WCAG criteria apply to
this document?

Your thoughts please.

Jim

James Corbett
IT Developer - Analyst
ITB/Solutions/BP&A/DevCentre/Developer Tools and Horizontal Initiatives
Services
613 941-9355 | facsimile / télécopieur 613-954-9222
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Canada Revenue Agency | 875 Heron Rd Rm H4-177, Ottawa ON K1A OL8
Agence du revenu du Canada | 875 chemin Heron, ch H4-177 Ottawa ON K1A 0L8
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada

"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken."
Oscar Wilde

From: Corbett, James
Date: Thu, Nov 01 2012 1:15PM
Subject: Re: WebAIM] Page verses document
← Previous message | No next message

Jared:

Could you elaborate, I have Google 'd until I was blue in the face and really couldn't nail anything down in relationship to your statement and the WCAG 2.0 AA recommendation.

Many thanks in advance,

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: October 26, 2012 12:36 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Page verses document

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Corbett, James wrote:

> Would the same WCAG criteria apply to this document?

If it is "web content", then WCAG would apply. If it is a txt file,
then it would only be necessary to implement the accessibility
requirements that are possible in that particular format.

Jared