E-mail List Archives
Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge
From: Austin, Darrel
Date: Jun 20, 2008 10:10AM
- Next message: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program : "Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge"
- Previous message: Hoffman, Allen: "Section 508 compliance for 1194.22(p) time out requirements"
- Next message in Thread: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program : "Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge"
- Previous message in Thread: Gareth Dart: "Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge"
- View all messages in this Thread
> I am new to this group and fairly new to accessibility. As the
> accessibility coordinator of a state agency, I have been asked to
> verify the validity of a contractor's up-charge from 640 to 970 hours
> to build accessibility into a Cold Fusion application. The application
> is in the planning stage
If it's in the planning stage, then I'd say that increasing the project
fee by 50% is a bit ridiculous.
Retrofitting a bad application? Then I can see that being valid. But,
yea, if one plans for accessibility, there really shouldn't be much or
any additional costs.
-Darrel
- Next message: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program : "Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge"
- Previous message: Hoffman, Allen: "Section 508 compliance for 1194.22(p) time out requirements"
- Next message in Thread: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program : "Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge"
- Previous message in Thread: Gareth Dart: "Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge"
- View all messages in this Thread