WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: table paging

for

From: ckrugman@sbcglobal.net
Date: Feb 6, 2011 5:45AM


JAWS versions will read items in a dropdown menu using a particular command
"alt down arrow" in most cases.
Chuck
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jordan, Courtney" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] table paging


> That's certainly a lot of pages! Is there any way that you can break it
> up into categories? Even as a sighted user, I would be frustrated
> looking through 500 options in a drop-down list. That is assuming that I
> even knew what the particular title of the page was. We can't expect
> people to remember the title of every page. People can generally hold
> about 5-7 or fewer items in memory. From my experience using JAWS 9, I
> couldn't get the screen reader to "read" any items under the first one.
> It would automatically trigger the first one and I would never get to
> the others. Including a button avoided that issue as it didn't trigger a
> JavaScript event from the drop-down selection itself, but from the
> clicking of the button.
>
> Good luck!
> Courtney Jordan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: adam solomon [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 5:20 AM
> To: WebAIM Discussion List
> Subject: [WebAIM] table paging
>
> What is the best way to implement a simple yet accessible paging. The
> two standard ways I see all over the place are:
> 1. set of numbers, each one a link to that particular numbered page,
> with arrow links to navigate to different sets of pages.
> 2. dropdownlist with all the pages, and a button next to it - choose the
> page number and press go.
>
> I personally prefer the second option - simple and to the point, and
> easier to markp up correctly. Yet, I am worried about a situation where
> there are many pages (500) and a keyboard user would have to navigate
> all the way down with arrow keys. The truth is that this is a problem
> even in the numbering paging - the user would have to suffer a number of
> postbacks before getting to the correct set of pages.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> --
> adam solomon
> linkedin <http://il.linkedin.com/pub/adam-solomon/24/449/a4>;
> blogix <http://adam.blogix.co.il/>;
>
>
>