E-mail List Archives
Re: does datepicker have to be accessible
From: ckrugman
Date: Feb 11, 2011 11:24PM
- Next message: adam solomon: "Re: Accessibility of Modal Dialogs"
- Previous message: Elle: "Accessibility of Modal Dialogs"
- Next message in Thread: adam solomon: "Re: does datepicker have to be accessible"
- Previous message in Thread: Keith (mteye): "Re: does datepicker have to be accessible"
- View all messages in this Thread
there are many sites where it has been made accessible and as a screen
reader I prefer using it at times or being able to have the choices. As a
screen reader I don't particularly like my choices being made for me because
someone has chosen to cut corners. When corners are cut it undermines the
whole concept and purpose of accessibility.
Chuck
----- Original Message -----
From: "Accessibility India" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] does datepicker have to be accessible
> On 2/8/11, adam solomon < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>> In many cases accessibility guidelines provide for alternative content
>> for
>> disabled users. Why would this not classify as one of those instances, as
>> the loss here is a small amount of convenience of picking the date, and,
>> in
>> fact, for a screen reader user it is probably easier typing the date
>> rather
>> than navigating through a datepicker.
> Yes Adam, Accessibility guidelines may use alternate methods in some
> instances mostly where the content may not be accessible in the
> straight way. When we can make any technology accessible there is no
> point in denying to make it accessible.
> Yes me as a screen reader user I do agree that input the text is
> simple but picking date from date picker is not complex if we are able
> to make it accessible.
>
>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Accessibility India <
>> <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>>
>>> sorry for the blank message.. my typo..
>>> Yes the date picker also should be accessible. We should not provide
>>> the users of different abilities in a separate way of interacting with
>>> the web content. Make the calender icon as a key board focusable
>>> event. on clicking the calender icon the user should be focus to the
>>> layer where the calender opens.
>>> Pic the date and by entering on the date the input field should be
>>> updated and the focus should come back to the calender icon by closing
>>> the calander.
>>> Clear instruction should be given to enter the date in correct format
>>> in the input field manually.
>>> Thankyou
>>> Rakesh
>>>
>>> On 2/8/11, adam solomon < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>>> > Scenario: a textbox meant to have a date written in it. A button next
>>> > to
>>> it
>>> > (calendar icon) which opens the datepicker to choose a date. One can
>>> enter a
>>> > date manually into the textbox, as well. Does the datepicker need to
>>> > be
>>> > accessible, or is it enough that the user can manually enter a date
>>> > into
>>> it
>>> > without making use of the datepicker? How should the format of the
>>> > date
>>> to
>>> > be entered be communicated to a screen reader user in an unobtrusive
>>> manner?
>>> > Thanks in advance
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > adam solomon
>>> > linkedin <http://il.linkedin.com/pub/adam-solomon/24/449/a4>
>>> > blogix <http://adam.blogix.co.il/>
>>> >
- Next message: adam solomon: "Re: Accessibility of Modal Dialogs"
- Previous message: Elle: "Accessibility of Modal Dialogs"
- Next message in Thread: adam solomon: "Re: does datepicker have to be accessible"
- Previous message in Thread: Keith (mteye): "Re: does datepicker have to be accessible"
- View all messages in this Thread