E-mail List Archives

Re: Actual Text attribute

for

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Jul 30, 2011 8:42PM


The primary distinction is that when a figure has actual text that figure isn't reported as a figure to the accessibility API, so the assistive technology won't read it as a figure. When alternative text is used, it is reported as a figure so a screen reader will say "graphic" or similar to indicate the role. If you use both, it is regarded as a figure.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems

<EMAIL REMOVED>
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility


-----Original Message-----
From: <EMAIL REMOVED> [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Karlen Communications
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 7:28 PM
To: <EMAIL REMOVED> ; WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Actual Text attribute

Sorry, forgot to answer your question.

Actual text is theoretically read in a more natural way as opposed to At Text. I don't come across it much, not a lot of people know about the Actual Text attribute.

By reading the content in a more natural way I mean with natural pauses and more "integrated" into the document. I'll test it again tomorrow to give you more information.

Cheers, Karen

Out of Office, Sent from my iPad

On 2011-07-30, at 5:44 PM, "Bevi Chagnon" < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote: