E-mail List Archives
Re: Is this a problem with ARIA implementation on authoring site or a problem with Jaws?
From: YOUNGV5
Date: Aug 4, 2011 9:03AM
- Next message: Donald Evans: "WCAG 2.0 SC 2.1.1?"
- Previous message: Donald Evans: "Re: Is this a problem with ARIA implementation on authoring site or a problem with Jaws?"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Is this a problem with ARIA implementation on authoring site or a problem with Jaws?"
- Previous message in Thread: Donald Evans: "Re: Is this a problem with ARIA implementation on authoring site or a problem with Jaws?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Donald, if I have time today, I will try to put an example together as
well. Have you considered using the aria-controls attribute?
Vincent Young
User Experience, Web Accessibility Specialist
Nationwide Corporate Marketing
Nationwide®
o | 614·677·5094
c | 614·607·3400
e | <EMAIL REMOVED>
From:
Donald Evans < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
To:
WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Date:
08/04/2011 10:45 AM
Subject:
Re: [WebAIM] Is this a problem with ARIA implementation on authoring site
or a problem with Jaws?
Sent by:
<EMAIL REMOVED>
Here is one way to do it:
http://websiteaccessibility.donaldevans.com/?p=174
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:38 PM, < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Hi Birkir,
>
> The link you provide points to a really good example of what not to do
on a
> web page, for many reasons.
>
> For your specific question, the problem you see is an authoring problem
> with the expandable text section. The expand/collapse control on the
page is
> not using ARIA.
>
> Visually, the control is an image of a plus sign when the section is
> collapsed, or a minus sign when the section is expanded. JavaScript is
used
> to show or hide the section, and toggle the image from plus to minus.
> However, the script does not change the alt text for the image to
indicate
> whether the section is currently expanded or collapsed. (The script
could
> easily be changed to fix that problem.)
>
> In theory, you could ARIA be used to provide the same indication. Of
> course, it would need to be toggled in the JavaScript also. And I have
not
> seen great screen reader support yet for ARIA implementations of
expandable
> sections, at least for examples I've seen. Maybe others have found
better
> examples.
>
> Dan Kinnunen
>
>
- Next message: Donald Evans: "WCAG 2.0 SC 2.1.1?"
- Previous message: Donald Evans: "Re: Is this a problem with ARIA implementation on authoring site or a problem with Jaws?"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Is this a problem with ARIA implementation on authoring site or a problem with Jaws?"
- Previous message in Thread: Donald Evans: "Re: Is this a problem with ARIA implementation on authoring site or a problem with Jaws?"
- View all messages in this Thread