E-mail List Archives
RE: Testing for compliance
From: Jim Thatcher
Date: Sep 5, 2002 7:09PM
- Next message: Jim Thatcher: "RE: Skip navigation and frames"
- Previous message: Kathleen Anderson: "Re: Testing for compliance"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: MacKay, Graham (JUS): "Testing for compliance"
- View all messages in this Thread
You might find my evaluation of testing tools helpful,
http://jimthatcher.com/erx.htm
Jim Thatcher
Accessibility Consulting
http://jimthatcher.com
512-306-0931
-----Original Message-----
From: MacKay, Graham (JUS) [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:08 PM
To: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Subject: Testing for compliance
Hi,
The recent post about testing with alternative user agents is really
pertinent to us at this time. While our department currently has an
initiative underway to make externally accessible websites W3C compliant as
far as accessibility is concerned, we are toying with the issue of how to
formally test each site... a sort of formal internal "sign-off" if you will.
What have some people used or proposed as a strategy for testing sites to
ensure their compliance?
G
--
Graham MacKay
Web Developer (OIP I&IT Intern)
Enterprise Application Services
Integrated Justice Information Technology Division
Ministry of Public Safety and Security
The Provincial Government of Ontario
18 King Street East, 18th Floor
Toronto, ON M5C 2X1
Email: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Phone: 416.326.9993
Fax: 416.314.0216
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Jim Thatcher: "RE: Skip navigation and frames"
- Previous message: Kathleen Anderson: "Re: Testing for compliance"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: MacKay, Graham (JUS): "Testing for compliance"
- View all messages in this Thread