E-mail List Archives
Re: Is breaking the back button a WCAG 2.0 accessibility failure?
From: Paul J. Adam
Date: Aug 23, 2012 1:13PM
- Next message: E.J. Zufelt: "Contenteditable and screen-readers"
- Previous message: Jim Allan: "Re: Is breaking the back button a WCAG 2.0 accessibility failure?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jim Allan: "Re: Is breaking the back button a WCAG 2.0 accessibility failure?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Well this is where the URL does not change at all so the entire new page/content is loaded in via AJAX I guess and then when the back button is pressed it reloads the whole page back to the homepage.
Paul J. Adam
Accessibility Evangelist
Deque Systems
<EMAIL REMOVED>
www.PaulJAdam.com
@pauljadam on Twitter
On Aug 23, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Jim Allan < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> It Violates User Agent Accessibility Guidelines
> 3.2.2 Back Button : The user can reverse recognized navigation between
> web addresses (e.g. standard "back button" functionality). (Level AA)
>
> from the latest editors draft
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2012/ED-IMPLEMENTING-UAAG20-20120816
>
> Jim Allan,
> Co-chair User Agent working group
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Paul J. Adam < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>> The back button is said to be the most used out of all the buttons on a web browser so if the user presses the back button and instead of taking them back to the previous screen it reloads the entire page and takes them to the home page, is that an accessibility failure?
>>
>> I know it's terrible usability.
>>
>> Paul J. Adam
>> Accessibility Evangelist
>> Deque Systems
>> <EMAIL REMOVED>
>> www.PaulJAdam.com
>> @pauljadam on Twitter
>>
>> >> >> >
>
>
> --
> Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator & Webmaster
> Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
> 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
> voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
> "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
> > >
- Next message: E.J. Zufelt: "Contenteditable and screen-readers"
- Previous message: Jim Allan: "Re: Is breaking the back button a WCAG 2.0 accessibility failure?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jim Allan: "Re: Is breaking the back button a WCAG 2.0 accessibility failure?"
- View all messages in this Thread