E-mail List Archives
Re: Screen reader indications of underlined or strike-through text
From: Liko, Todd
Date: Jun 18, 2014 3:55AM
- Next message: Liko, Todd: "Re: Screen reader indications of underlined or strike-through text"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Screen reader indications of underlined or strike-through text"
- Next message in Thread: Liko, Todd: "Re: Screen reader indications of underlined or strike-through text"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Screen reader indications of underlined or strike-through text"
- View all messages in this Thread
-----Original Message-----
From: <EMAIL REMOVED> [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: June 17, 2014 8:47 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Screen reader indications of underlined or strike-through text
David Ashleydale wrote:
> For something that completely unsupported, wouldn't the recommendation
> be to shore it up with some hidden text?
That is a hack. What happens when some screen readers start to support it? They then get the information twice.
The solution is for screen readers to get their act together and support this basic markup. It's maddening that screen readers still don't support basic, two-decade-old HTML like <strong> and <em>.
Jared
- Next message: Liko, Todd: "Re: Screen reader indications of underlined or strike-through text"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Screen reader indications of underlined or strike-through text"
- Next message in Thread: Liko, Todd: "Re: Screen reader indications of underlined or strike-through text"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Screen reader indications of underlined or strike-through text"
- View all messages in this Thread