E-mail List Archives
Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in aWCAG2.0conformingPDFdocument?
From: Olaf Drümmer
Date: Apr 16, 2015 2:58AM
- Next message: Graham Armfield: "ARIA Live and values that updates very quickly"
- Previous message: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in aWCAG2.0conformingPDFdocument?"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded inaWCAG2.0conformingPDFdocument?"
- Previous message in Thread: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in aWCAG2.0conformingPDFdocument?"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 16 Apr 2015, at 03:29, Andrew Kirkpatrick < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> I'm not nervous about this, but seek to help clarify the issue because this thread started with Duff raising the notion and discussing whether a WCAG SC addresses this. I
[...]
>
> That said, embedding the fonts avoids the issue so it is definitely the best practice for authors.
I do believe it might be a good idea if WCAG came up with provisions around availability of essential resources. The way to ensure availability of essential resources in PDF , when it comes to fonts, is to embed them. Things will be different for different technologies / file formats etc.
Or is there a provision in WCAG stating anything around 'essential resources'?
Olaf
- Next message: Graham Armfield: "ARIA Live and values that updates very quickly"
- Previous message: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in aWCAG2.0conformingPDFdocument?"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded inaWCAG2.0conformingPDFdocument?"
- Previous message in Thread: Olaf Drümmer: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in aWCAG2.0conformingPDFdocument?"
- View all messages in this Thread