E-mail List Archives

Re: tools for analysing web pages.

for

From: Birkir R. Gunnarsson
Date: Sep 27, 2015 5:21PM


The report is certainly interesting, but there are definitely inaccuracies.
AXe and Tenon are not included in the report (which is understandable
if the comparison is more than a few months old), and the information
regarding FireEyes is not accurate.
I have a lot of comments about other assumptions and statements in the
report itself, but this is not the time or place to discuss those
comments.



On 9/27/15, Lucy Greco < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> thanks for sending this report it was exalent information thanks
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Joseph Sherman < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone else seen this critical review of testing tools from Norway
>> earlier this year?
>>
>>
>> http://iktforalle.no/accessibility-checker-evaluation/objective_evaluation.html
>>
>>
>> http://iktforalle.no/accessibility-checker-evaluation/objective_evaluation.html
>>
>> Joseph
>> Sent from phone
>> >> >> >> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Lucia Greco
> Web Accessibility Evangelist
> IST - Architecture, Platforms, and Integration
> University of California, Berkeley
> (510) 289-6008 skype: lucia1-greco
> http://webaccess.berkeley.edu
> Follow me on twitter @accessaces
> > > > >


--
Work hard. Have fun. Make history.