E-mail List Archives
Re: FW: non-underlined link - will bolding meet contrastrequirement?
From: Jonathan Avila
Date: Jun 22, 2016 3:42PM
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Modal close button not focusable; ESC works"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Modal close button not focusable; ESC works"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: FW: non-underlined link - will bolding meet contrast requirement?"
- Previous message in Thread: Snahendu Bhattacharya: "Re: FW: non-underlined link - will bolding meet contrast requirement?"
- View all messages in this Thread
> You're statement is correct - making something bold does increase it's relative visible contrast - but it does not change the contrast ratio as determined by WCAG.
Bold text that is 14point through 17 point is the exception to this statement. That is -- bold text that is 14pt or larger has a lesser contrast ratio than non-bold text less than 18 pt according to WCAG 2. It doesn't guarantee it can be read by people with low vision or color deficiencies though.
Jonathan
Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
SSB BART GroupÂ
<EMAIL REMOVED>
703.637.8957 (Office)
Visit us online: Website | Twitter | Facebook | Linkedin | Blog
Check out our Digital Accessibility Webinars!
-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:32 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] FW: non-underlined link - will bolding meet contrast requirement?
Thad -
You're statement is correct - making something bold does increase it's relative visible contrast - but it does not change the contrast ratio as determined by WCAG.
Jared
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Thad C < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> I definitely defer to Jared on this. Sorry if my statement indicating
> that making a font bold may, in some cases, increase contrast was
> missleading .... always learning.
>
> Thaddeus
> On Jun 22, 2016 12:57 PM, "Jared Smith" < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
>> If the links are made bold, then they are no longer relying solely on
>> color to differentiate them from non-link text. Now bold is generally
>> less discernible than underline, and as Caitlin noted, bold can also
>> be used for emphasized text. While not optimal, I believe that bold
>> text (especially if used with sufficient contrast differences) would
>> be sufficient to meet the WCAG requirement for not relying on color
>> alone.
>>
>> Bold text does not change the contrast ratio. WCAG does have a lower
>> foreground-to-background ratio threshold for text that is 14 point
>> and bold or larger, but this would not be applicable to the contrast
>> requirement (3:1 ratio) for links vs. surrounding text for
>> non-underlined links.
>>
>> Jared
>> >> >> archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
>> >>
> > > archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
>
- Next message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Modal close button not focusable; ESC works"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Modal close button not focusable; ESC works"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: FW: non-underlined link - will bolding meet contrast requirement?"
- Previous message in Thread: Snahendu Bhattacharya: "Re: FW: non-underlined link - will bolding meet contrast requirement?"
- View all messages in this Thread