E-mail List Archives
Re: Batch HTML maker
From: L Snider
Date: Aug 19, 2016 2:31PM
- Next message: Jim Homme: "Re: Batch HTML maker"
- Previous message: Stacey Rayos: "Re: Batch HTML maker"
- Next message in Thread: Jim Homme: "Re: Batch HTML maker"
- Previous message in Thread: Stacey Rayos: "Re: Batch HTML maker"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Stacey,
Yes, I saw that too so I would believe them in terms of non storage. I have
a couple of documents that need an offline, non website solution but for
the rest this would work great!
I am still exploring download programs, will let you know if I come across
anything good!
Cheers
Lisa
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Stacey Rayos < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> You're welcome!
>
> I did notice this on their FAQ page <https://htmlg.com/help/>:
>
> Q: Is there an offline version?
> A: There's no offline version but the program needs internet connection
> only when you load the page. After that you can disconnect because
> everything is executed on the client side.
>
> So - not as convenient since you'd have to go on and off of the internet
> with each doc... but likely faster than a manual clean-up job. I also wish
> this were available as an offline, local application.
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:01 PM, L Snider < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> > Hi Stacey,
> >
> > Thanks! Now if I could find something similar as a program I can
> download,
> > then that would be perfect. This is good for most of my documents, but I
> > have a few documents that are restricted and shouldn't be done this way
> (I
> > know the info isn't stored but I need to be very conservative with a
> couple
> > of these!).
> >
> > We can definitely start with this one for now.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Lisa
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Stacey Rayos < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This one has worked for us better than anything else so far:
> > > https://html-cleaner.com/
> > >
> > > As far as batch processing, we have not been able to locate any
> > > consistently effective tools yet.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:08 PM, L Snider < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Jim,
> > > >
> > > > It can be any type of document, simple or complex.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Lisa
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jim Homme < <EMAIL REMOVED>
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Lisa,
> > > > > I don't have personal experience with what you just said, but I am
> > > about
> > > > > to give a tool I have here a try to see what happens. Can you give
> me
> > > an
> > > > > idea how complex one of your documents is, so I can try to produce
> a
> > > > > similar test here? If
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jim
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > =========> > > > > Jim Homme,
> > > > > Accessibility Consultant,
> > > > > Bender HighTest Accessibility Team
> > > > > Bender Consulting Services, Inc.,
> > > > > 412-787-8567,
> > > > > <EMAIL REMOVED>
> > > > > http://www.benderconsult.com/our%20services/hightest-
> > > > > accessible-technology-solutions
> > > > > E+R=O
> > > > >
> > > > >
- Next message: Jim Homme: "Re: Batch HTML maker"
- Previous message: Stacey Rayos: "Re: Batch HTML maker"
- Next message in Thread: Jim Homme: "Re: Batch HTML maker"
- Previous message in Thread: Stacey Rayos: "Re: Batch HTML maker"
- View all messages in this Thread