E-mail List Archives
Re: your thoughts on the WCAG test procedures
From: Jeremy Echols
Date: Jun 22, 2020 8:28AM
- Next message: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: your thoughts on the WCAG test procedures"
- Previous message: barry.hill3@sky.com: "Re: Diving into web-accessibility, what to start with?"
- Next message in Thread: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: your thoughts on the WCAG test procedures"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: your thoughts on the WCAG test procedures"
- View all messages in this Thread
We've found that accessibility insights is a wonderful shortcut for getting at a pretty baseline "this page is okay": https://accessibilityinsights.io/
It probably doesn't cover every single SC, but for us, at least, its combination of automated tests and very in-depth "guided" manual tests is extremely helpful. It's still a huge endeavor to test a site, but this at least gives us a consistent way to test and discuss each page we are analyzing.
-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of Julius Charles Serrano
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 12:47
To: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Subject: [WebAIM] your thoughts on the WCAG test procedures
Hi all.
First I want to acknowledge and thank you all for the extremely helpful discussions and information you are providing in this group.
I'd like to get your thoughts on the test procedures for the WCAG success criteria. Going through WCAG, I find that most success criteria have multiple sufficient techniques and failures, each one having its own test procedures.  Â
Example:
*Â Â Â Sufficient Technique for SC 1.3.1 > Situation A > ARIA11 > Test
procedure: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/aria/ARIA11.html*tests__;Iw!!C5qS4YX3!Q8dMmpacbBJAnvCN5gs6E1iSr1tvjyZq0qPlyVDpRYfDoA-Tp1Q2m7qFQzkb4SEDNQ$
*Â Â Â Failure for SC 1.3.1 > F2 > Test procedure https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/failures/F2.html*tests__;Iw!!C5qS4YX3!Q8dMmpacbBJAnvCN5gs6E1iSr1tvjyZq0qPlyVDpRYfDoA-Tp1Q2m7qFQzncTfkmeQ$ Â
I see how this can result to a very comprehensive accessibility test, however, my gut feel is that it would take a very long time to test a page if we go through each test procedure.
Please can you share your thoughts - is there another way of looking at it? I'm open to other perspectives. Also, your techniques in using the test procedures would be very useful.
Thank you for reading my message and I look forward to hearing from you.Â
Julius
- Next message: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: your thoughts on the WCAG test procedures"
- Previous message: barry.hill3@sky.com: "Re: Diving into web-accessibility, what to start with?"
- Next message in Thread: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: your thoughts on the WCAG test procedures"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: your thoughts on the WCAG test procedures"
- View all messages in this Thread