E-mail List Archives
Re: Scalable or Responsive and why
From: Aditya
Date: Oct 8, 2020 12:44PM
- Next message: Swift, Daniel P.: "Re: Scalable or Responsive and why"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Scalable or Responsive and why"
- Next message in Thread: Swift, Daniel P.: "Re: Scalable or Responsive and why"
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Scalable or Responsive and why"
- View all messages in this Thread
Responsive rearranges content blocks. Example, a list of links that are horizontally laid out would go under a hamburger menu when page is zoomed and users would have to navigate again to re orient and access content.
I guess it's picking what's best for your users.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Jonathan Avila < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Responsive is much better for users with low vision so they do not have to scroll horizontally to read a line of text. It would also likely be needed to meet WCAG 2.1 SC 1.4.10 which indicates text should fit into a width of 320CSS pixels without scrolling in the direction of the text.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
- Next message: Swift, Daniel P.: "Re: Scalable or Responsive and why"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Scalable or Responsive and why"
- Next message in Thread: Swift, Daniel P.: "Re: Scalable or Responsive and why"
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Scalable or Responsive and why"
- View all messages in this Thread