WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Non-textual content: tables?

for

From: Lars Ballieu Christensen
Date: Dec 8, 2022 1:57AM

Exactly __

Venligst/Kind regards

Lars
----
Lars Ballieu Christensen
Rådgiver/Adviser, Ph.D., M.Sc., Sensus ApS
Specialister i tilgængelighed/Accessibility Consultants
Tel: +45 48 22 10 03 – Mobil: +45 40 32 68 23 - Skype: Ballieu
Mail: <EMAIL REMOVED> – Web: https://www.sensus.dk

Vi arbejder for et tilgængeligt og rummeligt informationssamfund
Working for an accessible and inclusive information society



On 08/12/2022, 07.31, "WebAIM-Forum on behalf of Josua Muheim" < <EMAIL REMOVED> on behalf of <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:

With “Headings”, Lars probably means “<th>” elements (not to confuse with i.e. <h1>).


> On 7 Dec 2022, at 19:06, Lars Ballieu Christensen < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Hi Vera
>
> A table is not non-textual content; a table is a structure that should be marked up as such with prober headings, a caption and a summary. Rather than SC 1.1.1., you probably want to have a look at SC 1.3.1.
>
> Venligst/Kind regards
>
> Lars
> ----
> Lars Ballieu Christensen
> Rådgiver/Adviser, Ph.D., M.Sc., Sensus ApS
> Specialister i tilgængelighed/Accessibility Consultants
> Tel: +45 48 22 10 03 – Mobil: +45 40 32 68 23 - Skype: Ballieu
> Mail: <EMAIL REMOVED> – Web: https://www.sensus.dk
>
> Vi arbejder for et tilgængeligt og rummeligt informationssamfund
> Working for an accessible and inclusive information society
>
>
>
> On 07/12/2022, 14.04, "WebAIM-Forum on behalf of Pospelova Vera" < <EMAIL REMOVED> on behalf of <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Our country adopted the EN 301 549:2019 norm/standard, which is based on WCAG 2.1 guidelines. I have a question regarding the 1.1.1 success criteria, which is non-textual content. In concrete, I cannot find anywhere how the tables should be considered. We are sure that figures must have an alternative text as they are non-textual content, but our doubt is with the tables, we do not know how they should be considered, and we couldn't find any solid clarification in the norm/standard.
>
> Please can you help us?
>
> Thank you,
> Regards,
> Vera.
> > > > >
>
>
> > > >