WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: WCAG SC 1.4.10 (Reflow) and browser window height

for

From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Apr 18, 2023 6:29AM

1.4.10 Reflow is scoped very explicitly to a specific CSS pixel size of
viewport (to its detriment, but that's a different conversation perhaps;
also, it's inadequate in this definition because it doesn't take into
account browser chrome, Windows taskbar, etc...). So purely from a
normative point of view, I *think* you can only make a pass/fail
statement at those specific viewport dimensions (something I've railed
against for a good while). I would note this problem as a best practice
(a la "while nominally this probably passes, in practice users will be
affected...")

P
--
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ / https://github.com/patrickhlauke /
https://codepen.io/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ / https://www.deviantart.com/redux
https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke


------ Original Message ------
From "Steve Green" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
To " <EMAIL REMOVED> " < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Date 18/04/2023 13:22:12
Subject [WebAIM] WCAG SC 1.4.10 (Reflow) and browser window height

>I am testing a website that contains a date picker that remains in the same position on screen when the page is scrolled. At 400% zoom the whole of the date picker is visible in a 1080px high window. However, on monitors that are less high, the last row of dates is not visible and there is no way to get to them.
>
>The SC doesn't say anything about window height, so this does not appear to be a non-conformance. Am I missing something?
>
>Regards,
>Steve Green
>Managing Director
>Test Partners Ltd
>020 3002 4176 (direct)
>0800 612 2780 (switchboard)
>07957 246 276 (mobile)
>020 7692 5517 (fax)
>Skype: testpartners
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
>www.testpartners.co.uk
>
>Connect to me on LinkedIn - http://uk.linkedin.com/in/stevegreen2
>
>>>>