E-mail List Archives
Re: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions
From: Austin, Darrel
Date: Nov 9, 2004 8:31AM
- Next message: Austin, Darrel: "Re: fixed width or resizable pages"
- Previous message: reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;: "Re: fixed width or resizable pages"
- Next message in Thread: Philip Kiff: "Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- Previous message in Thread: Iain Harrison: "Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- View all messages in this Thread
> i always makw the links visible to all users (not tiny) beasue I fell
> they have value to all users and that it re-inforces to users that the
> web is for all.
Anyone ever user test things like visible skip links on a regular audience
of user testers? I wonder if they are simply ignored by those that don't
utilize them, or if they add a bit of unecessary complexity (ie, 'what is
that link for?') to the unaware?
On our new site:
http://www.courts.state.mn.us
I made the skip-links visibility a user-option, rather than having them on
by default for that (assumed) reason.
> As for the site map - I'm a firm beleiver in having a text based site
> map above the fold visible for all readers too. I beleive a such is
> becoming a standard, one that I endorse since it's valuable to all.
Yes, site maps I find are useful to pretty much anyone...and anything (like
google bots).
-Darrel
- Next message: Austin, Darrel: "Re: fixed width or resizable pages"
- Previous message: reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;: "Re: fixed width or resizable pages"
- Next message in Thread: Philip Kiff: "Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- Previous message in Thread: Iain Harrison: "Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- View all messages in this Thread