E-mail List Archives
Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions
From: Mary Martinson Grossnickle
Date: Nov 10, 2004 8:49AM
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "Beta version of visual impairment simulator for Windows"
- Previous message: Austin, Darrel: "Re: fixed width or resizable pages"
- Next message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- Previous message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- View all messages in this Thread
> > That would suggest that we _should_ remove all extraneous navigation.
> > Mike
>
> Mary I am sure will clarify, but I thought her point was also
> partly that in the the case of screen reader users, the current, observed
> pracitce of many users was that they do in fact make use of skip nav
links.
Yes, that was my point, thanks.
Mary
>That seems also to be the conclusion of the study pointed to in an earlier
posting about
> observing screen reader users. I'm not sure how removing skip nav links
> will assist this population, including especially those with cognitive
> disabilities. Skip navigation links are not, at this point, "extraneous
> navigation", are they?
I would agree these are not extraneous, but necessary.
Mary
>
> ----
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>
>
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "Beta version of visual impairment simulator for Windows"
- Previous message: Austin, Darrel: "Re: fixed width or resizable pages"
- Next message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- Previous message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: Dayton Art Alternative Descriptions"
- View all messages in this Thread